Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-03-29 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-03-29 House Journal Page 3488 HB 325 There being no objection to the motion to return to second reading for the purpose of considering Amendment No. 17, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 17 was offered by Representative Kelly: Page 1, lines 1 - 3 (title amendment): Delete all material. Insert ""An Act relating to modification of royalty to encourage production from an oil pool containing heavy oil; and providing for an effective date."" 1996-03-29 House Journal Page 3489 HB 325 Page 1, line 8: Delete "royalty is not payable" Insert "royalty is payable at a rate of two percent" Page 1, line 12: Delete "exemption from" Insert "reduction in" Page 2, line 26: Delete "exemption from" Insert "reduction in" Page 2, line 28: Delete "exemption" Insert "reduction" Page 3, line 5: Delete "exemption" Insert "reduction" Page 3, line 10: Delete "an exemption from" Insert "a reduction in" Page 3, line 14: Delete "exemption" Insert "reduction" Page 3, line 15: Delete "an exemption from" Insert "a reduction in" Page 3, line 17: Delete "exemption" Insert "reduction" Representative Kelly moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 17 be adopted. Objection was heard. 1996-03-29 House Journal Page 3490 HB 325 Amendment to Amendment No. 17 was offered by Representative Green: Add the following to the amendment: Page 2, line 19: Delete 1,825" Insert 2,190" Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 17 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw the amendment to Amendment No. 17. There being no objection, it was so ordered. There being no further objection to Amendment No. 17, it was adopted, and the new title appears below: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 325(FIN) am An Act relating to modification of royalty to encourage production from an oil pool containing heavy oil; and providing for an effective date. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 325(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 18. Representative Navarre objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 18 was offered by Representative Green: Page 2, line 19: Delete 1,825" Insert 2,190" Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 18 be adopted. 1996-03-29 House Journal Page 3491 HB 325 Representative Navarre objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 18 was offered by Representative Davies: Delete 2,190" Insert 2,007" Representative Rokeberg objected. The question being: Shall the amendment to Amendment No. 18 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 325(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, James, Long, Mackie, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Nicholia And so, the amendment to Amendment No. 18 was not adopted. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 325(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Brice, Foster, Green, Kohring, Kott, Long, Mackie, Martin, Mulder, Porter, Rokeberg, Toohey, Vezey, Williams 1996-03-29 House Journal Page 3492 HB 325 Nays: Barnes, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kubina, Masek, Moses, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Robinson, Sanders, Therriault, Willis Excused: Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 18 was not adopted. Representative B.Davis placed a call of the House. The Speaker invoked Section 102 of Masons Manual. The call was satisfied. The question being: Shall CSHB 325(FIN) am pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 325(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 26 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Nays: Brice, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Moses, Navarre, Robinson, Therriault, Willis Excused: Nicholia And so, CSHB 325(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Vezey moved the effective date clause. The question being: Shall the effective date clause be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-03-29 House Journal Page 3493 HB 325 CSHB 325(FIN) am Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 27 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Nays: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Excused: Nicholia And so, the effective date clause was adopted. Representative Davies gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSHB 325(FIN) am.